العدد ٠١ ، يونيو ٢٠٢٦كلامٌ خفيف، عينٌ حادّة.

العالم . Souk Weekly

The Majority That Cannot Vote: The Gulf's Expat Question

In several Gulf states, foreign workers outnumber citizens, creating a society and an economy built on a population with no path to belonging.

بقلم Sara Qureshi2 دقيقة قراءة

حُدِّث

The Majority That Cannot Vote: The Gulf's Expat Question. Souk Weekly world.

Here is a fact that startles people the first time they hear it. In several Gulf states, citizens are a minority in their own country, sometimes a small one. The cooks, drivers, nurses, engineers, bankers, and builders who keep daily life running are, in huge numbers, foreigners on temporary visas. Demographically, the Gulf is one of the most expatriate places on earth, and that shapes everything.

How it got this way

The arithmetic is straightforward. Small native populations, vast ambitions, and a sudden flood of oil wealth meant the labour to build modern states simply did not exist locally. So it was imported, first for construction and oil, then for every service a fast-growing economy demands. The buildings rose, the cities filled, and the imported workforce never stopped being central.

Crucially, this labour arrives without immigration's usual endpoint: settlement. Most foreign workers come on contracts tied to a sponsor and an expiry date. You can spend an entire working life in a country and remain, legally, a guest. In most cases there is no naturalisation queue waiting at the end.

The bargain and its strains

For decades this was framed as a bargain that served both sides. Workers earn far more than they could at home and send money to families abroad. States get the labour they need without altering the citizen body that defines them. The remittances flowing out of the Gulf are an economic force across whole regions of Asia and Africa.

But the model has well-documented strains. A workforce with no path to belonging and little bargaining power is exposed to abuse, and the sponsorship systems that bind workers to employers have drawn sustained criticism. Reforms have come, in places, unevenly, often under outside scrutiny tied to the same sports and tourism ambitions that put the region on the world stage.

The question underneath

Step back and a harder question surfaces, one the Gulf has not resolved. What do you owe the people who build and run your country but can never join it? A society where the majority are permanent temporaries is a genuinely novel thing, and its long-term stability is not guaranteed.

Some states have started experimenting at the edges: longer-term residencies, easier pathways for the highly skilled, modest openings toward something like belonging. Whether these are tweaks or the start of a real rethink is one of the most consequential open questions in the region. The Gulf has built dazzling cities on imported hands. What it eventually decides those hands are owed will say a great deal about what kind of societies these become.

النشرة الأسبوعية

بريدٌ واحد في الأسبوع.

ما يستحقّ، وما يُدهش، وما هو من نسيج السوق.